Five Reasons Why “There Are No Small Churches” ISN’T…
The world is filled with small churches. Refusing to acknowledge that really isn’t encouraging, it’s condescending. Of course, there are small churches. Lots of them. And it’s okay, not just to acknowledge that reality, but to celebrate it. Here’s why.
SMALL IS NORMAL.
Why would someone feel the need to say there are no small churches? Obviously they don’t mean numerically. Ninety percent of churches are under 200. Eighty percent are under 100. Half of the churches on earth are under 50.
That’s a whole lot of small.
SMALL DOESN’T NEED SYMPATHY.
If “there are no small churches’ isn’t a statement about numbers, what is it about? What people mean by it, of course, is that there are no secondary churches. That churches of all sizes have value.
I agree with that sentiment. But I do have a problem that people feel the need to express it. The implication is that if a pastor says, “I pastor a small/rural church” they must be stating a problem. Or that we’re complaining. Or looking for sympathy. Or worst of all, that we’re settling for less.
Small churches don’t require sympathy any more than a little toe needs sympathy from a big toe. Acting like we don’t exist isn’t encouraging, it’s unintentionally condescending. We all have a part to play and small/rural church play theirs.
SMALL IS NOT SETTLING.
Just because a church is small does not mean anyone is settling.
A rose bush isn’t settling when it doesn’t grow bigger than 10 feet tall. Instead, it can now take all the energy it was using for growth and concentrate on blooming. It stops becoming what’s it’s meant to be and starts being what it’s meant to be.
Are there some small churches that are settling for “us four, no more, shut the door?” Sure there is. But there are also some very large churches that are settling for “we’ve arrived, and now we can coast on our success.”
When souls are at stake, settling is a sin. And size has nothing to do withit.
SMALLIS NOT ANTI-BIG.
Why don’t people ever say, “there are no big churches?” Because big churches obviously exist and are doing great things – just like small/rural churches. Small churches and big churches are not enemies. We’re different. And that difference is good.
To wildly paraphrase Paul’s body analogy, “If the whole body were a megachurch, how would anyone ever get to hang out with their pastor after church? If the whole body were a small church, where would large groups of people meet to worship Jesus together?”
SMALL IS ESSENTIAL.
There are many places in the world where big and megachurches can’t exist. But small churches can, and do, exist everywhere.
Even in places where there are a lot of megachurches. Small churches in some areas far outnumber megachurches. Why? Because there are a lot of people who feel closer to Jesus in small settings. It’s what nourishes their spirit. Its where they prefer to bring their friends to introduce them to Jesus.
I don’t want to live in a world without megachurches or small/rural churches. We need each other!